Today I was looking at Anne of
Green Gables pins on Pinterest, because that’s the sort of geeky thing I like
to do. One link led to another, and I
ended up reading the comments on an article, which is generally not a very good
idea, since most are often ignorant and/or stupid. However, this time it turned out well,
because now I have something to write about! I don’t remember what the actual article was about, but I remember the
comment. It was a woman complaining that
in the first books of the Anne series, there are feminist ideals, and Anne
seems to have a career. She was
lamenting the fact that in the later books, Anne’s career fades away and she
seems stuck “doing her duty” taking care of her children. She seems to imply that Anne would have been
happier if she could have just stuck to her career and not have to be burdened
by taking care of children.
I agree with this anonymous commenter that
Anne’s focus does shift from writing to children part way through the
series. However, I do not agree that
this change of focus is sad or is unwanted by Anne. Although Anne’s desire to write is prior in
time to her desire to be a wife and mother, it is the latter which truly makes
her happy and which is her true vocation.
This is clear in the books dealing with Anne’s life after her marriage,
but particularly in Anne of Ingleside. Throughout the book, Anne is continuously
thinking about how much she loves her children and how she delights in taking
care of them. Not that she is always
perfectly, unnaturally happy—the last chapter where Anne thinks Gilbert no
longer cares for her shows that even the happiest of people have bad times and
gives the whole book a more realistic quality.
In light of the reality present in the books, the commenter’s remark
seems pretty ridiculous, but it is, unfortunately, indicative of the mindset of
our times. Modern generations seem to
have lost a few very important ideas: that vocations exist, that women chose to
be wives and mothers, and that doing so is not being repressed. With these concepts forgotten, purposely or
otherwise, it is no wonder that this woman was disappointed in Anne in the later
books. But I pity her, not being able to
see of understand the beauty I see and understand in Anne’s joy in her “living
epistles,” as she calls her children once, and in living her vocation to the
fullest.
No comments:
Post a Comment